Tag Archives: the beatles

Five Years of Listening to The Beatles

3 Replies

On the ninth of September 2009 after four years of arduous work using the latest technology available, The Beatles’ discography from “Please, Please Me” from ’63 to 1970’s “Let It Be” were released, remastered in both mono and stereo mixes. For what must have been a long wait for those who owned the last remasters from 1987, every snare hit, string pluck and glorious melody were now able to be heard in a revitalised condition. “The Beatles: Rock Band” game was also released on the same date, allowing the young and old to play along with the four guys through their journey from the Cavern Club to Abbey Road studios. It was a good day for Beatles fans…. though it wasn’t really for me.

It isn’t that something bad happened to me on that day. It was another day in the opening week of a new year at school as far as I was concerned. I didn’t have a clue as to what was going on. I had never given the band a look before that month, but it was then that everything changed. Whilst casually browsing the Internet as you do, I noticed on the television that the now-defunct channel VH1 Classic was dedicating one half an hour slots everyday to The Beatles suitably titled “Beatlemania”. This was because of 09/09/09, but I didn’t know this so I assumed it was just a random move on their part to show The Beatles videos on music television.

Any of you who read my posts in the Blogger may remember a statement in my “Across the Universe” entry, where I controversially stated that when I was younger I didn’t actually think The Beatles existed. I say controversial – not a lot of people cared or probably even read the post in the first place – but I said that and then just moved on as if I hadn’t. I feel as if I should address this. To cut it short, the “Paul Is Dead” theories played a massive part, the supposed backward messages as well as the general consensus that The Beatles were ‘the greatest band of all time’ and Sgt. Pepper is the best album ever all threw me off a bit. They couldn’t be as good as everyone said they were. I bet I wouldn’t like them if I listened to their stuff. I listened to “Sgt. Pepper” to try and understand, and it still underwhelmed me. Maybe The Beatles just weren’t the band for me.

But I had to admit the sight of them together, laughing, joking and generally having a good time in videos such as “The Night Before“, “Penny Lane“, “Hey Bulldog“, “One After 909” on “Beatlemania” was honestly the first time I had watched the four men perform/mime their songs whilst being within the vicinity of each others’ personal space, which essentially nullified all prior thoughts I had about the group. The band actually had been on Earth for a period of time in the past. And the few of their songs that were shown on the programme I really got to like, especially “Penny Lane” I must have hummed that tune to myself as I was walking to school every day. Those were good days.

I felt as if I had missed out by listening to The Beatles at the age of fourteen. For some reason I thought that I should have known their songs for years by that time. But on the contrary there was so much to discover. I am just lucky that I started before it was too late. By the end of the year I had downloaded most of their albums and my obsession continued well into 2010, as I received “The Beatles: Rock Band” as a late Christmas present. Had a good time with that game, even if my interest in it faded as weeks went on. But its official forum was pretty cool. I was a member on there, and along with its community pulled off something of epic proportions. I’ll talk about that tomorrow.

The group were undeniably unique – the charisma and chemistry between all four members are qualities that arguably haven’t been matched – and their music was of such great quality that it continues to stand the test of time. From Key Stage 4 to the second year of university, The Beatles have been in my head. Here is to many more years.

My iPod #337: The Beatles – Everybody’s Got Something to Hide Except Me and My Monkey

1 Reply

Hey what’s up how’s it going?

Today’s first song is from disc two (or side four for all you vinyl people) of The Beatles self-titled album from 1968. Or “The White Album” as almost everyone refers to it. That year was when John, Paul, George and Ringo started to dislike each other a bit. Why? Well there’s one word that the latter three, and a lot of fans would answer that question with. Yoko. John Lennon and Yoko Ono were hardly ever apart, even during recording sessions, and this aggravated George, Paul, and Ringo quite a bit. How did John answer this? Possibly by many ways which would have gone on behind closed doors, but for us he wrote “Me and My Monkey”.

“Monkey” should be played very loudly out of speakers. It gets me in the mood to party. It sounds like the band had a very fun time recording it, what with the random howls and screams which appear after almost every “Come on” that John yells, that incessant bell that never seems to end and when John also appears to start becoming a sheep right when the song begins to fade out.

It may be about heroin use and there may be some sexual connotations thrown in too, but those are just interpretations.

Dunno about you, but has anyone else noticed during the breakdown near when only the guitars and bass are playing that the bass plays a sharper note than the guitar chords? Just irks me a bit. But still, it’s cool. Very good hard rock song.

My iPod #324: The Beatles – The End

1 Reply

It all came down to this in 1969. This was The Beatles’ last song ever. Well, it was meant to be. “Let It Be” was released a few months later after “Abbey Road“, and even on the latter album itself “The End” is followed up by “Her Majesty“. But even then, the track was recorded with the full understanding between the four guys that this would be the last thing they would do together. How did they decide to it? In one of the most epic ways possible. And all in two minutes too.

If you have “Abbey Road”, you know that the second half of it is the famous medley where all the songs run into each other. So not only are you treated to that, a musical movement beautifully put together with orchestra and guitars everywhere, but this is the climax of it all. The big finale. With a drum solo by Ringo Starr (the first and only one he ever did with the group) symbolising his recognition 0f being the steady, solid drummer and the rotating guitar solos by Paul, George and John which seem to go on and on and on until a piano plays, the four members sing ‘that’ line and the finishes on a rising chord progression.

Now you may read that and think “Well, that doesn’t sound that good. What’s all that about?” And I know I can’t do it enough justice in writing. You do have to hear it to be convinced. Actually listen to ‘The Abbey Road Medley”. Search it up on YouTube. You will not be disappointed.

My iPod #316: The Beatles – Eleanor Rigby

1 Reply

I don’t like “Eleanor Rigby” that much. I feel like it should grip me somehow with its dramatic strings and depressing lyrics, but it never does. Is there something wrong with me? Because from what I’ve read and researched, this track is one of the most popular by The Beatles and definitely one of the most loved on the band’s album “Revolver”. But I have to be that guy who prefers “I Want to Tell You” and “Doctor Robert”.

The song is the second one on “Revolver”, and the first time Paul takes lead vocal on the album. It’s not one to listen to if you’re in a good mood. The lyrics focus on two lonely characters, Eleanor Rigby and Father MacKenzie. The former wishes to be married and the latter writes sermons that apparently no one will hear. At the end of the track, the former character has died and the latter conducts her funeral. The irony.

I may not like it that much. But this track was a sign of many exhibiting the band’s evolution from the mop-top pop group that amazed everyone in the 60s to the experimental group that maintained that admiration.

My iPod #292: The Beatles – Don’t Let Me Down

Leave a reply


Let me make it clear that this is the “Naked” version of “Don’t Let Me Down” that I’ll be talking about. Why is this? Because I much prefer it to the original released back in 1969.

Both recordings were made during a period when the four members barely wanted to be in a room together. The thing is you can really tell this when listening to the original. The performance is slow, lethargic and so loose that it sounds like it could collapse at any moment. Paul’s a bit full on with his harmony, and it’s not John’s greatest vocal either. Maybe that’s why Phil Spector dropped it from “Let It Be”, although it would have been a better option than “Dig It” and “Maggie Mae” for sure. I can’t get into it – it lacks that tight-knit delivery and closeness that we all associate The Beatles with.

But the “Naked” version…….. Ah. It’s beautiful. If only the technology of 2003 existed back in the 70s. “Let It Be…. Naked” was Paul McCartney’s vision of what the album should have been had Phil Spector not put on his choirs and various orchestras into some of the tracks. “Maggie Mae” and “Dig It” were taken off and replaced with this wonderful version of “Don’t Let Me Down”, made up of two performances of the song the band did during the infamous rooftop concert.

The track is given a lift by a subtle change in tempo and a higher key, but what makes it so much better than its 1969 counterpart is how brighter it sounds. You can sense that the atmosphere whilst performing this version was a lot less tense. George’s lower harmony vocal in the chorus is a nice little addition, the instrumentation is tighter, the singing is terrific…… Everything sounds better.

Oh, and that bass playing by Paul after the final iteration of the title until the end of the song. Absolutely glorious. I’m very sure John looks at him as if to say “Damn…..” in appreciation, but he can’t because he’s still singing. Oh well.

Watch them perform it, by clicking on thiiiiiiiiiis.